Sept. 4, 2014
In a heated dialogue on Facebook yesterday, Joshua Blakeney and I argued for some time with a belligerent, irrational, platitude-wielding communist.
Despite the individual in question mostly just spewing traditional Marxist venom at us—labeling us “Nazis,” “fascists,” “reactionaries” and other dirty words—some real insight about the inadequacy of Marxist ideology can be gleaned from the faulty thinking displayed by this misguided person.
The first false assertion of this Marxist and all those who espouse Marxist ideology (all Marxists make the same or similar claims because they are reading from a script provided to them by their gurus and have no original thoughts or analysis), is that the present world order is spearheaded by “WASPs,” i.e., rich white capitalists who adhere to a “white supremacist” ideology and seek to hold down and exploit those not part of the white in-group.
This all-pervasive “white supremacist” bogeyman lies at the core of Marxist discourse. In the Marxist worldview, all the ills of the world can be attributed to the “white supremacist capitalist class.”
This claim is not only obviously racist, but it is inaccurate.
If, as Marxists claim, “white supremacists” are at the helm of the global power structure today, then how do we explain the present policy of mass non-white immigration into all Western countries? Surely, if white racists controlled the immigration policy this wouldn’t be happening. How do we explain why most Western governments promote multiculturalism as a state ideology? How do we explain the “civil rights” movement in the United States which supposedly lifted blacks out of the shackles of oppression and discrimination in that country? How do we explain why the US government and other Western governments — again, supposedly dominated by “white racist capitalists” — have enacted massive social equalization programs (affirmative action, minority scholarship programs, etc.) that are designed to give minorities living in European-majority countries unfair advantages so as to artificially “equalize” society. If white racists hold the reins of power than why was the apartheid regime in South Africa overthrown with the consent and assistance of many Western governments? Why are scientists such as Philippe Rushton who have studied and published works on race and IQ hounded and harried and made into lepers in the academic community? Surely if white supremacists ran the show, academics such as Rushton would be celebrated and not traduced. The topic of race is a veritable taboo in Western societies, and even broaching the issue will result in one being branded a “racist” and even a “hate criminal.”
This false Marxist premise of white supremacist domination cannot stand up to scrutiny. The falsity of this Marxist meme is certainly a deliberate attempt to obfuscate the true nature of power today.
It is certainly true that whites were the dominant group in the world in the past three or four centuries, but it is not the case today and hasn’t been that way for many decades. The old WASP elite has been essentially dethroned and replaced by a hostile Jewish elite. This takeover process probably began at the beginning of the 20th century, and has been solidifying over the past 40 or so years. This new Jewish ruling class, as Joshua Blakeney has noted, cynically used the human rights struggles of blacks, Amerindians, and other minorities to discredit white gentiles who Jews sought to supplant as a competitor group. (See The Culture of Critique by Kevin MacDonald) It is this new Jewish faction that is highly dominant today in the global economy and by extension global politics.
This is a fact that Marxists seek to suppress. Marxists are essentially fighting a long-vanquished bogeyman, and therefore cannot come to terms with the reality of Jewish power.
But why do they do this?
To understand this it must be said that Marxism was, at its core, a Jewish strategy of self-empowerment. It was created and fostered by Jewish ideologues as a mechanism of unseating Gentile rulers and overturning Gentile political systems. Communism has operated as little more than a vehicle for Jewish power, and that is its function. Communism stems from the Jewish totalitarian tradition, which is why so many of its ideological forebearers were Jews with rabbinical roots (i.e., Moses Hess, Karl Marx, Rosa Luxenbourg, Leon Trotsky (Bronstein), Ana Pauker (Rabinsohn), etc.)
Communism in practice was the act of enslaving Gentiles under a tyrannical Jewish dictatorship. It was in a sense a historical re-creation of the Jewish ghetto (shtetl) where authoritarian rabbis had complete control over all aspects of Jewish life. Instead of rabbis controlling Jewish life, communist states enforced their rigid doctrines on the Gentile masses. Those who refused to obey the self-appointed overseers of society were summarily shot or exiled to concentration camps. This was especially true in the Soviet Union and communist Eastern Europe where “anti-Semitism” was decreed a crime punishable by death or imprisonment.
To further illustrate this point, one need look no further than the 1939 text A Program for the Jews by Rabbi Harry Waton. In the book Waton acknowledged the Jewish roots of Marxism and boasted of its revolutionary purpose to elevate Jews into a position of global hegemony. He writes:
It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the Jews readily took up Marxism; all this was in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the Jews. The Jews should realize that Jehovah no longer dwells in heaven, but he dwells in us right here on earth; we must no longer look up to Jehovah as above us and outside of us, but we must see him right within us.
… Since the Jews are the highest and most cultured people on earth, the Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth. Now, indeed, this is the historic destiny of the Jews.
… Judaism is communism, internationalism, the universal brotherhood of man, the emancipation of the working class and the human society. It is with these spiritual weapons that the Jews will conquer the world and the human race.
Doesn’t this explain why Marxists only ever critique Gentile capitalists? This is part of the “culture of critique” aimed at discrediting non-Jewish aristocracies. Joshua Blakeney has opined that Marxist egalitarian rhetoric was largely a ruse calculated to incite the Gentile masses into a revolt against Gentile aristocracies. Jewish communists would tell the Gentile working classes that they were being oppressed and exploited by the upper classes and therefore needed to be rid of those in power. In essence, the Jewish communists used flowery egalitarian rhetoric to hoodwink Gentiles into rising up and deposing their rulers, thereby clearing the way for Jews to seize the institutions of the state.
Marxism posits that race, ethnicity and religion should play no role in shaping a society, thereby eliminating all competitor group cohesion. Marxists assert that distinctions of race, culture and ethnicity are merely “oppressive tools” of the capitalist class to divide the working class. What a perfect brew for a highly ethnocentric and racially-conscious group such as Jews to appropriate wealth and power while the deracinated masses struggle to form any kind of coherent identity.
Marxists and communists today actively work to deflect attention from the new Jewish ruling class, offering skewed and nonsensical analysis to avoid addressing Jewish power and misconduct. This is not surprising considering their ideology is a by-product of Jewish thinking. Its fundamental tenets were devised by Jews to deconstruct Gentile societies, ripening them for a Jewish ethnic takeover. As such, Marxist dogma cannot compute with today’s undeniable reality of Jewish-Zionist power.
In the Facebook debate Blakeney observed that “[Marxist] economistic class analysis falls apart as soon as certain Jews act economically irrationally to better their perceived group interests. Marxism denies ethnicity and race. [Communists are upset by this] because if race isn’t a social-construct then [their] worldview is obsolete.”
One such example of this “economically irrational” behaviour on the part of Jews was the funding of the communist revolutionaries who overthrew the Russian Czar by Jacob Schiff and other seemingly “capitalist” bankers on Wall Street. Schiff provided millions of dollars to the Bolsheviks not because he thought communist economic theories were congruent with his capitalistic banking practices but because he understood it to be a Jewish-led effort to overthrow Czarist Christian rule in Russia. For Jews, ethnic group interest transcends any political differences they may have. Schiff himself publicly acknowledged the consequential Jewish role in the so-called “Russian revolution,” stating, “Thanks are due to the Jew that the Russian revolution succeeded.”
Marxists and communists today pride themselves as subversive radicals upsetting the status quo and challenging authority, but in reality they serve the ruling elite. Blakeney points out that,
Marxism is so subversive that you can buy all the most prominent Marxian works in the capitalist-owned bookstores such as Heather Reisman’s Chapters. The works of Rushton et al are investigated by the Canadian state and in some instances burned. But THEY are in power[?]
So you can find and purchase Marxist and communist literature in mainstream bookstores today, and even find texts whitewashing the crimes of Soviet Bolshevism in these shops, but literature that highlights the negative effects of Jewish power such as David Duke’s magnum opus titled Jewish Supremacism is confiscated and burned by many Western states including Canada. Blakeney further observed:
[Communist] ideology is obsolete which is why it is 100% safe for professors to teach, for capitalist book stores to promote etc. We are living in the age of Jewish-Zionist imperialism and [Marxists] are harping on about WASPs who were largely disempowered and displaced several decades ago. [Marxists] deflect attention from the real oppressors because a key tenet of [their] ideology is Jewish exceptionalism. We are the genuine revolutionaries. [They] are [ideologues] who aide and abet the [Jewish] ruling class.
The cultural taboo and state suppression of criticism of Jews is in and of itself a solid indication of who rules us.